Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Friday, December 26, 2008
To avoid unwanted telemarketing calls, please register your telephone number in NDNC Registry.
Please call 1909(toll-free) from your Airtel Mobile or Landline Phone
SMS "START DND" to 1909 from your Airtel Mobile
Airtel Mobile Services:
Please click here if you are an Airtel Postpaid or Prepaid Mobile customer and wish to register on our Do Not Disturb list.
Please click here if you are an Airtel landline customer and wish to register on our Do Not Disturb list.
If you are already registered on Do Not Disturb and continue to recieve unsolicited calls, click here to file a complaint.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Announcing this in the Lok Sabha, Union Minister of State for Human Resource Development D. Purandeswari, said the pay revision was only one of the steps required to improve the quality of higher education.
The Minister said henceforth there would be only three designations for university and college teachers – assistant professor, associate professor and professor.
Only those with a Ph.D would be appointed, promoted or designated as professor. But this provision would not be applicable to those already holding the designation.
For the first time, posts of professors will be introduced in both undergraduate and postgraduate colleges. The number of posts of professors in undergraduate colleges will be 10 per cent of the number of posts of associate professors.
In postgraduate colleges, there will be as many professorial posts as the number of departments.
The National Eligibility Test will be compulsory for appointment at the entry level of assistant professor for all those who do not have a Ph.D.
In place of grade pay as applicable to Central government employees, the term “Academic Grade Pay (AGP)” will be used for teachers and equivalent positions. Different AGPs of Rs. 6,000, Rs. 7,000, Rs. 8,000, Rs. 9,000, Rs. 10,000 and Rs. 12,000 have been approved for teachers and equivalent positions.
A Higher AGP (HAGP) of Rs. 6,000 has been recommended for all assistant professors at the entry level to make it more attractive compared to the entry level grade pay for the Civil Services and other professionals under the 6th Central Pay Commission. And, 10 per cent of the posts of professors in universities will be in HAGP of Rs. 12,000 with prescribed eligibility conditions.
Those working as a lecturer (selection grade) or a Reader will continue with the designation till they are selected as associate professors.
Parity between teachers and librarians/directors of physical education (DPE) will be maintained except for the age of superannuation which will continue to be 62 years for librarians/DPEs.
As is the practice, the Centre will pick up 80 per cent of the additional expenditure that States will have to bear on account of the pay revision. But this will be applicable only to those administrations which accept the entire pay revision scheme.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Sunday, December 14, 2008
Chaudiri Abdul Majeed and Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood, who held a series of senior posts in Pakistani nuke programme, went to Taliban headquarters in Kandahar in mid-August 2001 and spent three days with bin Laden who was keen on acquiring weapons of mass destruction, the book says.
In fact, Mahmood was said to be more close to Khan, the 'Father of the Islamic bomb' and the mastermind behind a vast clandestine enterprise which sold nuclear secrets to rogue states like Iran, North Korea and Libya. He also set up the pilot plant for Pakistan's uranium-enrichment programme.
However, the so-called deal did not materialise as the meeting between the Pakistani nuclear scientists and bin Laden ended inconclusively when the al-Qaida leader, along with some of his senior associates, had abruptly left for the mountains of northwestern Afghanistan.
And, according to the book, 'The Man From Pakistan' -- the true story of the world's most dangerous nuclear smuggler AQ Khan -- before leaving, bin Laden had told his followers that "something great was going to happen, and Muslims around the world were going to join them in the holy war". A couple of weeks later, the twin towers in New York were brought down.
The 414-page book is authored by two investigative journalists -- Douglas Frantz and Catherine Collins.
What's more revealing is that a year before they met bin Laden in Kandahar, the two Pakistani nuke scientists had set up a non-profit organisation, Ummah Tameer-e-Nau, to carry out relief work in Afghanistan, including advising the Taliban on scientific matters.
And, on the board of the organisation were several Pakistani army generals sympathetic to the Taliban cause, and it was one of the few non-government groups that the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar, had allowed to operate in Afghanistan, the book says.
"(But) not long after opening their office in a house in Kabul, the scientists met with Mullah Omar and bin Laden, and the conversation had shifted from relief work to weapons development. At one point, during his visits to Afghanistan, Mahmood provided Osama bin Laden's associates in Kabul with information about the construction of a nuclear weapon," the authors write.
However, post-9/11 attacks that shook the US, as part of his crackdown on terror groups operating in Pakistan, the then Chief Executive General Pervez Musharraf forced Mahmood to opt for an early retirement as "he had expressed sympathies for the Taliban and other Islamic extremists".
In fact, in his writings and speeches, Mahmood had advocated sharing Pakistan's nuclear weapons technology with other Islamic nations to hasten the "end of days", which he believed would give rise to Muslim dominance in the world, according to the book which the 'Los Angeles Times' says is a "richly reported" one.
Saturday, December 13, 2008
The Indian warship was patrolling in the Somali waters when it rushed to rescue MV Gibe, a merchant vessel flying the Ethiopian flag.
The pirates had fired at the merchant vessel with their small arms, when it sent out a rescue call and the Indian warship, which was sailing nearby moved its Marine Commandos on an helicopter to help the distressed cargo vessel, he said.
The Navy flew its Marine Commandos on helicopters to the scene of the pirate attack and rescued the ship. MV Gibe was later escorted to safety, he added.
The Indian commandos also recovered 12 AK 47 guns, three rifles, two grenades along with other ammunition.
Out of 23 arrested pirates, 12 are reportedly from Somalia and 11 from Yemen.
The Indian warship, the INS Mysore, was dispatched to the Gulf of Aden after a spike in piracy and hijackings off the coast of Somalia, which is caught up in an Islamic insurgency and has had no functioning government since 1991.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
The Dawn News TV channel quoted Rehman Malik, advisor to the prime minister on interior affairs, as saying that Pakistan has banned the group with immediate effect and its activities were under observation.
A government official said that authorities had been ordered to close the offices of Jamaat-u-Dawa.
"Instructions have been issued to seal Jamaat-ud-Dawa offices in all the four provinces as well as Azad Kashmir," said interior ministry spokesman Shahidullah Baig, referring to Pakistani-administered Kashmir.
"Now the orders will be implemented."
Earlier in the day, Pakistan said it will fulfil its obligations under a UN Security Council statement targeting four members of Lashkar-e-Taiba and charity Jamaat-ud-Dawa linked to the banned Islamist group.
The statement, which gave no further details, came after the UN Security Council sanctions committee targeted four members of the group blamed for the Mumbai attacks, and a charity widely viewed as its political arm, for an assets freeze and other sanctions.
"Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani has said that Pakistan has taken note of the designation of certain individuals and entities by the UN under 1267 resolution of the UN Security Council and would fulfil its international obligations," a government statement said.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
A committee of the United Nations Security Council has placed sanctions against Pakistan-based Jamaat-ud-Dawa, a front organisation for Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), declaring it a terrorist organisation.
The committee has added Jamaat and four Lashkar leaders to a list of firms and people facing sanctions for ties to al-Qaeda or the Taliban the UN said.
The terrorists added to the sanctions list include Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, which the UN statement described as the leader of the group.
The others are Pakistan-born Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, the chief of operations, Haji Muhammad Ashraf, the chief of finance, and India-born Mahmoud Mohammad Ahmed Bahaziq, described as a financier for the group who served as its chief in Saudi Arabia.
The same four were hit with US Treasury Department sanctions in May. The UN sanctions, covered by Security Council resolution 1267 from 1999, include the mandatory freezing of assets and travel bans.
(Hafiz Muhammad Saeed (L) and Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi)
Imposing the sanctions, the Council asked all member states to freeze their assets and imposed travel ban and arms embargo against them.
However, it remains to be seen whether Pakistan upholds the UNSC sanctions.
“This has happened after the visit of Zardari and Manmohan to the UN. The anti-terror mechanism put in place by both countries has started working. It's now up to Islamabad to take the final decision but I'm sure that they'll uphold UNSC decision. This is the result of cooperation between the two countries," Pakistan's UN Ambassador Abdullah Hussain Haroon told CNN-IBN.
India had demanded a ban on the outfit following terrorist attacks in Mumbai which were suspected to have been orchestrated by Lashkar.
India had said that the so-called charity organisation Jamaat-ud-Dawa is but a front organisation for the outlawed terrorist outfit Lashkar-e-Toiba, which the UN banned in 2002.
Mumbai Crime Branch, in its investigations of the terror strike, has alleged that Lashkar head Zaki-ur-Rehman is the mastermind of the carnage. The other key players are Abu Hamza Kahafa and Hafiz Muhammad Saeed.
US TAKES A TOUGH STAND
The United States has said that it will be good if Pakistan "shifts" to a tougher approach towards Lashkar-e-Toiba, the prime suspect in the Mumbai terror attacks, which left at least 171 people dead.
"We're continuing to follow the reports. What we are looking to see, if there's going to be a shift in Pakistan into how they deal with LeT," The White House Press Secretary Dana Perino said.
"And if it proves out, over time, that there is that shift, then that would be a good one and something that we would welcome. But it's just… it's just too early for us to say," she said.
Sunday, December 7, 2008
from a charity linked to Lashkar said.
"This happened this afternoon, security forces took over the camp," said an official with Jamaat-ud-Dawa charity.
A resident close to the camp on the outskirts of Muzaffarabad said he had seen security forces raid it. The charity official said there were fighters there from Lashkar, the prime suspect in the attacks on Mumbai last month that killed at least 171 people.
Saturday, December 6, 2008
top space scientist who was involved in the successful launch of Chandrayaan-1.
"If everything goes as per the plan, we will be ready to send a man to moon by 2020," said Jitendranath Goswami, director of the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL), Ahmedabad.
PRL is the laboratory that helped build a payload called the high energy X-ray spectrometer that will look for water ice in the polar regions of the moon. Goswami, who hails from Assam, was Saturday interacting with students, journalists, and academics, in Guwahati.
"Maybe in 50 years from now, there will be an alternate space to live in Mars," the space scientist said. Goswami said he felt proud to be part of the historic moon mission and spelt out other programmes in the pipeline.
"As a scientist I have miles to go," Goswami was modest in his reply to a question as to how he felt being part of Chandrayaan-1. "But we're not in any great hurry. We're hoping to get data (from Chandrayaan-1) for a long time."
He stressed on the need to help children get attracted towards science and space technology by urging parents to do something inspirational. "Parents and guardians can inspire their children to achieve something in life," Goswami said.
Friday, December 5, 2008
high-powered bipartisan US Congressional commission, adding it is the "intersection of nuclear weapons and terrorism."
"If one has to map terrorism and weapons of mass destruction today, all roads would intersect in Pakistan," the report "World at Risk" said while devoting a whole chapter on the Islamic country.
"Although Pakistan is an ally (of US) there is a grave danger it could also be an unwitting source of a terrorist attack on the United States, possibly with weapons of mass destruction," the report said.
The Commission was chaired by former US Senator Bob Graham and included Wendy Sherman, a former senior Clinton Administration official, who is now the chair of the foreign policy transition team of the incoming Obama Administration.
Speaking on CNN television, Graham called Pakistan the "intersection of the perfect storm."
In remarks suggesting that Pakistan could be emerging as a most lethal tinderbox, the report noted that "Pakistan has nuclear weapons and a history of unstable governments and parts of its territory are currently a safe haven for al-Qaida and other terrorists."
The authors of the report said they had "singled out Pakistan for special attention in the report, as we believe it poses a serious challenge to America's short-term and medium-term national security interests. Indeed many government officials and outside experts believe that the next terrorist attack against the US is likely to originate from within the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) in Pakistan."
"Moreover, given Pakistan's tense relationship with India, its buildup of nuclear weapons is exacerbating the prospect of a dangerous arms race in South Asia that could lead to a nuclear conflict," the commission warned.
The rapid spread of nuclear technology in countries like Pakistan and Iran are seen as the main dangers with Islamabad seen as perhaps the most dangerous of them all.
The odds that terrorists will soon strike a major city with nuclear or biological weapons are now higher than ever, the panel said, identifying Pakistan as an area of "grave concern" due to terror networks and its atomic arsenal.
"In terms of the next of proliferation and terrorism, Pakistan must top the list of priorities for the next President and the Congress," the report said.
The Commission suggested that the next President and the Congress should implement a comprehensive policy towards Pakistan that works with Islamabad and other countries to eliminate terrorist safe havens through military, economic and diplomatic means and secure biological and nuclear materials in Pakistan. They should also counter and defeat extremist ideology and constraint a nascent nuclear arms race in Asia.
The report warned that a nuclear or biological attack is likely within five years and called for decisive global action to address the threat. It urged the creation of a new post in the White House that would focus solely on overseeing government efforts to prevent an attack with WMD.
Without urgent action, "it is more likely than not that a WMD will be used in a terrorist attack somewhere in the world by the end of 2013," the commission said.
"America's margin of safety is shrinking," it added. The main dangers identified by the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism are the rapid spread of nuclear technology in countries such as Pakistan and Iran and poor security in biotech industries worldwide.
the army are very close after Pakistan army chief Kayani handpicked Lt Gen Pasha as the ISI boss). Second, it was signaling to the world that the civilian government didn’t matter; what mattered was the army.
The third reason is that it saw in the situation an opportunity to recoup the morale of its soldiers. The USpressed ‘‘ war on terror’’ on Pakistan’s western front is believed to have badly sapped the army’s morale. Many of the soldiers don’t believe in it — there were as many as 900 desertions last year.
Fourth, it reckons that by playing the India card, it could win back some of its lost credibility and authority among the people. Musharraf ’s last months had badly dented the army’s standing in Pakistani society and the ‘‘ war on terror’’ has eroded its popularity . With Zardari & Co seen as soft on India, the army was now sensing an opportunity of staging a comeback.
In fact, one estimate in New Delhi is that the Mumbai carnage , and the expected backlash from India, is aimed at a larger goal — to set the scene for an army coup. Top officials, however, discount the possibility — at least for now, although they don’t discount that the army is pushing to carve out its independent space and a bigger stake.
That’s where India’s dilemma comes in. If it were to flex its muscle, mass its soldiers along the border and tell Islamabad that it means business — as many people, incensed with the repeated terrorist attacks, would like the government to do — it could be playing into the Pakistan army’s hand.
New Delhi knows that the Americans have more levers on Pakistan than it has. But it doesn’t know how much pressure the US was willing to exert on Islamabad.
While there is an overlap of interest with India now (six American were, after all, killed in the attack), US’s bigger interest is in forcing Pakistan’s hand in the fight against al Qaida and the Taliban.
So, when Condoleezza Rice came over on Wednesday, she said all the right words but, in concrete terms, promised to press Pakistan on one thing — to ask for a ban on Lashkar-e-Taiba’s political wing, Jamaatud-Dawa . The Dawa is not an underground organization like Lashkar, although it recruits people for terror, as it did with captured Mumbai attacker, Ajmal Amir Kasav.
India is also uncertain of the implication of getting the US and others involved in the standoff. It fears that could lead to the internationalizing of the Kashmir dispute.
Everyone loves a good crisis , and all of them were looking to get something out for themselves from it if they could get their finger in the pie. That’s India’s second dilemma — it knows only the US can deliver but it doesn’t know if it’s a good idea to press it for help beyond a point.
Ask any top government official and he or she will say, ‘‘ We want outcome, not statements.’’ But they don’t really know how to secure
that outcome. Should it turn to the doubtful constable — in this case, the Pakistan army — for help? Not really. Should it insist with the friendly officer — in this case, the US — to make his boss wait and catch the thief first? It’s of no use, he won’t .
So, India waits staring at the various non-options , waiting for a bright idea to strike it. Meanwhile, the thief is at the safe distance, from where he is now thumbing his nose at you.
Sources have told NDTV in Pakistan that it is possible. This comes after America did some tough talking with the army and the civilian government to arrest the LeT founder.
Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari is grappling for control with the all powerful army and ISI calling the shots. However, it is not the first time Zardari is battling intelligence agencies.
Just before slain former Pakistan premier Benazir Bhutto's return to Pakistan in 2007, she had openly said she feared there was a threat to her life from former ISI chief Hamid Gul and the intelligence bureau chief Brigadier Ijaz Shah.
Then there was the assassination attempt when she returned in October 2007, killing 140 people in a rally in Karachi. Benazir narrowly escaped and Zardari openly accused the ISI of trying to kill her. Benazir herself hinted at that the next day.
When she was killed a year ago, Zardari openly blamed the ISI. Now that he is the president, Zardari is facing his toughest challenge as he tries to assert authority over an organisation that has the backing of the one institution in Pakistan that matters, the army.
Meanwhile, Interior Advisor to the Prime Minister in Pakistan, Rehman Malik, has said the country would extend unconditional cooperation to India to bring the culprits to justice.
"A criminal is a criminal whether he is from Pakistan, India or anywhere else in the world. But we need concrete evidence against those mentioned by India and the law of the land will take its course," said Rehman.
terror camps in Pakistan, it may be surprising to know that more than 1100 Pakistani nationals, most of them Hindus, are living in the city. Actually, some 280 of them have applied for Indian citizenship.
According to a source in city police, approximately 1050 Hindus, 45 Muslims and 15 Sikhs and others from Pakistan are currently staying in the Orange city. Sources also pointed out that around 280 Hindus of Pakistani nationality have applied for Indian citizenship. A couple have already been granted Indian citizenship. Some 300 Pak nationals are staying on long-term visas. As per rules, an applicant has to spend seven years in India to become eligible to apply for citizenship. Two Bangladeshi Muslims are also presently staying in the city.
City police’s data also show that around 25 Pakistani nationals who came to city are at present untraceable. Senior officials from the intelligence say that the list of the untraceable Pakistanis is quite old. None of them was present at the designated address when verification was last done. A source said the untraced Pak nationals had remained under cover and did not get themselves registered. “Even if they are alive, they must be very old by now,” said a source from intelligence department.
Migration to India from Pakistan, especially for Hindus, is a regular phenomenon. The most common reason is reunion with families that separated during partition of India. “Residing in an Islamic country also means one often has to face harassment and humiliation,” says Mahesh Tharwani, a migrant who got Indian citizenship about a decade ago.
Bakr Eid against the Mumbai terror attacks. They point to a larger purpose behind the 26/11 strikes seeing in them an attempt to trigger communal violence. To that end, the symbolic protest is a call to evoke the spirit of India's secular values and ensure harmony among an agitated citizenry.
"Terrorists expect to polarize communities here, and hope the people will take the violence to the next level. The conflict is between a civil, secular democracy and barbaric forces that want to drag us back to medieval times," says theatre personality Feroz Khan. But he's clear Indians will not allow that. For him, the protest is an important milestone. "You've felt it in your heart, now it's time to show it on the streets," says Khan, who has directed well-known plays such as Tumhari Amrita.
The protest becomes more relevant because it cuts across all communities and sects within Islam. "The coming together of the clergy is momentous because religion is their life and terrorism is an attack on their faith," says actor Jaaved Jaffrey.
"This is no mourning. This is a protest against using terms from Islam for acts of terror."
The protest is also a call to nationalism. The Mumbai terror strikes were aimed at the country, says Qari Muhammad Mian Mazhari, editor of Urdu daily Secular Qayadat. "We are first Indians and then anything else.
The attack was on India, on India's systems. We must convert them into a foundation for the creation of a strong nationality spirit, sadly missing today," he says. He adds: "And for this, it is religious organizations which have to come forward and forge the spirit."
Thursday, December 4, 2008
The British Broadcasting Corp. cited unconfirmed reports from airport officials as saying late Thursday that up to six gunmen had been shot and killed at New Delhi's international airport. But Indian officials told the AP there was a minor incident and no deaths.
India had declared a security alert at three major airports, including Delhi and the IT hub Bangalore, and added extra checks to vehicles and luggage after warnings from intelligence agencies, officials said on Thursday.
Local television showed armed police guarding entrances to Delhi's international airport. Police cordons had also been set up outside the airport in the southern industrial city of Chennai.
The heightened security comes days after the militant attacks in Mumbai that killed 171 people.
Indian television said the alert was issued after an e-mail from Deccan Mujahideen, the same group that claimed responsibility for the Mumbai attacks. Officials said they did not have information about this.
“More checking of passenger luggage of people coming to the airport, more thorough checking of vehicles coming to the airport,” Moushumi Chakravarty, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Civil Aviation, said.
“There are more security measures to control the airspace also. There are security personnel manning the perimeter of the airports.”
When you open the site, you find only a single page with this message "Unity is power. Let's unite by registering here." Then there are three fields - Name, Email and Mobile Number. Once you register your details, you get a confirmation message that "your details have been received by us. It is not known whether it's a serious campaign by an individual or an "online game" to fool people. The owner of the site must come up with motive, agenda and his real objective behind creating this campaign. We recommend people to abstain from giving their email id till the true nature of the movement is ascertained.
The website URL is located here -http://www.reformindiamovement.com/live/default.asp.
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
The game-changer, outlined by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, among others, robs Islamabad of the fig leaf that Zardari used in his interview on Larry King Live that ''stateless actors'' are holding the whole world hostage and Pakistan was not to blame. Rice said in effect that the excuse does not absolve Pakistan responsibility for terrorist acts that originate from its territory,“ Rice said.
Although US officials have not outright approved immediate punitive Indian strikes against terrorist targets in Pakistan, it is clear Rice has bought time for Islamabad to prove its bonafides. Pakistan has a ''special responsibility'' and needs to act ''urgently'' she said, even as India has indicated it will wait for a Pakistani response to its demands before any punitive action.
In Washington, experts pressed the administration to expand the scope of punitive strikes to an international level to avoid making it an India-Pakistan issue, particularly since the death toll included citizens of ten countries.
''Rather than simply begging the Indians to show restraint, a better option could be to internationalise the response. Have the international community declare that parts of Pakistan have become ungovernable and a menace to international security,'' Robert Kagan, an influential analyst with the Carnegie Endowment, said.
''Would such an action (strikes) violate Pakistan's sovereignty?'' Kagan asked in an op-ed, and answered, ''Yes, but nations should not be able to claim sovereign rights when they cannot control territory from which terrorist attacks are launched.''
Rice echoed this outlook more discreetly and cautiously.
Pakistan's civilian government has sought to portray its helplessness in governing its own territory. In fact, in a startling slip noted by the Economist, Zardari said in a television interview last week that ''if any evidence points towards any individual or group in MY PART OF THE COUNTRY,'' he would take action. The implication, it said, was Pakistan was already severed if with parts of the country out of federal control.
While US position towards Pakistan has hardened perceptibly after the Mumbai attack, Indian officials are still leery about Washington’s approach. The hard part to swallow for New Delhi is that the Bush administration, while pushing for a strategic relationship with India, has bankrolled what some are already dubbing a terrorist state to the tune of $ 10 billion since 2002. Most of the money, according to the US government’s own audit, has gone towards building Pakistan's military muscle against India.
On Tuesday, even as Rice counselled patience and restraint in New Delhi, India’s Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon made the rounds in Washington, explaining India’s position and the growing anger across the country after Pakistan’s latest provocation.
Menon packed more than a dozen meetings, including with former intelligence czar and Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte, Under Secretary of State William Burns, House speaker Nancy Pelosi and several top lawmakers as Washington struggled to contain Indian outrage. New Delhi’s message was uniform: India’s patience is wearing thin.
The Indian Embassy said later that ''unequivocal condemnation of the (Mumbai) incident and the need for the perpetrators to be held accountable was reiterated,'' at the meetings. It was also indicated that there would be full cooperation and support at various levels, including government, from the US to India as it dealt with the consequences of the incident, it added.
From all accounts, India too appears to be preparing ground for punitive action if Pakistan fails to respond and act adequately.
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
RESHMA and Sunil Parekh were among the first to die when gunmen forced their way into the Tiffin restaurant at Oberoi Hotel in Mumbai, but it was 44 hours before their family in Sydney had confirmation of the terrible news.
Reshma was shot in the head; beside her, her husband lay with a bullet hole in the back of his neck. Their dinner companions had also been murdered.
Darshak Mehta knew all four. Reshma was his wife's beloved sister and the dinner companions were also friends. A cousin was luckier. Celebrating with family at a Lebanese restaurant on the rooftop of the Taj hotel, they escaped even while carrying an immobile family matriarch down 19 floors of fire stairs.
"If anyone has the right to be angry and stir up a lust for revenge it is me," said Mr Mehta, 51, of Mosman, the son of a wealthy Mumbai family who knew many of those caught up in the terrorist attacks. He and his wife, Alpana, have lived in Australia for the past 20 years.
Mr Mehta said he wanted to speak about his loss not to generate publicity for "a terrible, terrible tragedy" but because he was concerned that media commentary on Muslims has been damaging and inflammatory.
"I don't think at a time like this you really need to stir passions. We are still extremely raw."
He said every Indian he knew was angry about what had happened. Venomous words from Western commentators who assumed they could represent the victims were presumptuous and did not help, and the incendiary approach of grouping all Muslims with the actions of a few extremists was wrong and "extremely counterproductive".
He would prefer to see coverage of the majority of Muslims who are as appalled as anyone by the terrorist acts. Muslims in India number 120 million and, apart from a few highly publicised exceptions, there is relative communal amity.
"The silent [Muslim] majority have got to get up and speak out [against] people going around, in the name of their religion, killing people and spreading hatred. I am sure most of them don't share this agenda and philosophy, and yet they are strangely silent."
Mr Mehta believes now more than ever people need to think of Gandhi's words. "He said an eye for an eye will only leave the whole world blind. [And] be the change you want to see in the world."
"It would be so easy for me to be just angry. [The terrorists] have snuffed out two loving members of my family, left my two nieces orphaned - their world is crashing around them. If I was to meet the murderers I would not say … 'I hope you rot in hell'. If you don't forgive, you take yourself down to the level of that person. What will be achieved by being angry?"